Gambia vs Mauritania: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Gambia
0
in 2018
Mauritania
0
in 2018
Gambia rank
162nd
Mauritania rank
162nd
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Gambia
- Mauritania
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 0 against 0 in Mauritania, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Gambia ahead.
Gambia ranks 162nd and Mauritania ranks 162nd of 167 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5 | 1 | 4 | Gambia |
| 1970s | 5 | 1 | 4 | Gambia |
| 1980s | 4.1 | 1 | 3.1 | Gambia |
| 1990s | 3 | 1.9 | 1.1 | Gambia |
| 2000s | 2 | 1.6 | 0.4 | Gambia |
| 2010s | 1.56 | 0 | 1.56 | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Gambia or Mauritania?
- Gambia, at 0 against 0 in Mauritania as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Gambia and Mauritania?
- 0, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Mauritania?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2018.
- How do Gambia and Mauritania rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Gambia ranks 162nd and Mauritania ranks 162nd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).