Equatorial Guinea vs Turkmenistan: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 2 against 2 in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 125th and Turkmenistan ranks 125th of 167 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 4 and Turkmenistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2 | 1 | 1 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1.2 | 0.2 | Turkmenistan |
| 1990s | 1.7 | 1.1 | 0.6 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 2 | 1 | 1 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 2 | 1.67 | 0.3333 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Equatorial Guinea or Turkmenistan?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 2 against 2 in Turkmenistan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Equatorial Guinea and Turkmenistan?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Turkmenistan?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2018.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Turkmenistan rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 125th and Turkmenistan ranks 125th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).