El Salvador vs Sierra Leone: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- El Salvador
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 4 against 4 in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
El Salvador ranks 34th and Sierra Leone ranks 34th of 167 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3 | 2.56 | 0.4444 | El Salvador |
| 1970s | 2.78 | 1.89 | 0.8889 | El Salvador |
| 1980s | 3 | 1 | 2 | El Salvador |
| 1990s | 3.43 | 1.43 | 2 | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 4 | 3.38 | 0.625 | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, El Salvador or Sierra Leone?
- El Salvador, at 4 against 4 in Sierra Leone as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between El Salvador and Sierra Leone?
- 0, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Sierra Leone?
- 48 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2018.
- How do El Salvador and Sierra Leone rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- El Salvador ranks 34th and Sierra Leone ranks 34th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).