Dominican Republic vs Timor-Leste: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Dominican Republic
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 4 against 4 in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 34th and Timor-Leste ranks 34th of 167 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4 | 1.5 | 2.5 | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 4 | 3.78 | 0.2222 | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Dominican Republic or Timor-Leste?
- Dominican Republic, at 4 against 4 in Timor-Leste as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Dominican Republic and Timor-Leste?
- 0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Timor-Leste?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2018.
- How do Dominican Republic and Timor-Leste rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Dominican Republic ranks 34th and Timor-Leste ranks 34th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).