Cote d'Ivoire vs Zimbabwe: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Cote d'Ivoire
3
in 2018
Zimbabwe
3
in 2018
Cote d'Ivoire rank
94th
Zimbabwe rank
94th
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 3 against 3 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 94th and Zimbabwe ranks 94th of 167 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1 | 2.3 | 1.3 | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 2.1 | 2.1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Cote d'Ivoire or Zimbabwe?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at 3 against 3 in Zimbabwe as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Cote d'Ivoire and Zimbabwe?
- 0, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Zimbabwe?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Zimbabwe rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 94th and Zimbabwe ranks 94th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).