Côte d'Ivoire vs Zambia: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Côte d'Ivoire
3
in 2018
Zambia
3
in 2018
Côte d'Ivoire rank
94th
Zambia rank
94th
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Zambia
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 3 against 3 in Zambia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Zambia ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 94th and Zambia ranks 94th of 167 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1 | 3 | 2 | Zambia |
| 1970s | 1 | 1.4 | 0.4 | Zambia |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2.1 | 2.8 | 0.7 | Zambia |
| 2000s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 3 | 3.62 | 0.625 | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Côte d'Ivoire or Zambia?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 3 against 3 in Zambia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Côte d'Ivoire and Zambia?
- 0, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Zambia?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2018.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Zambia rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 94th and Zambia ranks 94th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).