Cote d'Ivoire vs Tajikistan: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Cote d'Ivoire
3
in 2018
Tajikistan
3
in 2018
Cote d'Ivoire rank
94th
Tajikistan rank
94th
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 3 against 3 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.
Across all 50 years both countries report, Tajikistan has been ahead every year.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 94th and Tajikistan ranks 94th of 167 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1.2 | 0.2 | Tajikistan |
| 1990s | 2.1 | 2.3 | 0.2 | Tajikistan |
| 2000s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Cote d'Ivoire or Tajikistan?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at 3 against 3 in Tajikistan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Cote d'Ivoire and Tajikistan?
- 0, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Tajikistan?
- 50 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2018.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Tajikistan rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 94th and Tajikistan ranks 94th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).