Cote d'Ivoire vs Pakistan: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Pakistan
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 3 against 3 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Pakistan ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 94th and Pakistan ranks 94th of 167 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1 | 2.14 | 1.14 | Pakistan |
| 1980s | 1 | 1.7 | 0.7 | Pakistan |
| 1990s | 2.1 | 2.9 | 0.8 | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 3 | 2 | 1 | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Cote d'Ivoire or Pakistan?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at 3 against 3 in Pakistan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Cote d'Ivoire and Pakistan?
- 0, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Pakistan?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2018.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Pakistan rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 94th and Pakistan ranks 94th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).