Central African Republic vs Iraq: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Iraq
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 3 against 3 in Iraq, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Iraq ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 94th and Iraq ranks 94th of 167 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Iraq in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1 | 1.8 | 0.8 | Iraq |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2.6 | 1 | 1.6 | Central African Republic |
| 2000s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Central African Republic or Iraq?
- Central African Republic, at 3 against 3 in Iraq as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Central African Republic and Iraq?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Iraq?
- 49 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2018.
- How do Central African Republic and Iraq rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Central African Republic ranks 94th and Iraq ranks 94th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).