Burkina Faso vs Honduras: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Burkina Faso
4
in 2018
Honduras
4
in 2018
Burkina Faso rank
34th
Honduras rank
34th
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Burkina Faso
- Honduras
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 4 against 4 in Honduras, a difference of 0.
Across all 56 years both countries report, Honduras has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 34th and Honduras ranks 34th of 167 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.1 | 3 | 1.9 | Honduras |
| 1970s | 2.22 | 3 | 0.7778 | Honduras |
| 1980s | 1 | 3.12 | 2.12 | Honduras |
| 1990s | 1.9 | 4 | 2.1 | Honduras |
| 2000s | 3.8 | 4 | 0.2 | Honduras |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Burkina Faso or Honduras?
- Burkina Faso, at 4 against 4 in Honduras as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Burkina Faso and Honduras?
- 0, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Honduras?
- 56 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2018.
- How do Burkina Faso and Honduras rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Burkina Faso ranks 34th and Honduras ranks 34th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).