Burkina Faso vs Guatemala: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Burkina Faso
4
in 2018
Guatemala
4
in 2018
Burkina Faso rank
34th
Guatemala rank
34th
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Burkina Faso
- Guatemala
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 4 against 4 in Guatemala, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Guatemala ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 34th and Guatemala ranks 34th of 167 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.1 | 2.4 | 1.3 | Guatemala |
| 1970s | 2.22 | 2.78 | 0.5556 | Guatemala |
| 1980s | 1 | 2.22 | 1.22 | Guatemala |
| 1990s | 1.9 | 3.4 | 1.5 | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 3.8 | 4 | 0.2 | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Burkina Faso or Guatemala?
- Burkina Faso, at 4 against 4 in Guatemala as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Burkina Faso and Guatemala?
- 0, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Guatemala?
- 57 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2018.
- How do Burkina Faso and Guatemala rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Burkina Faso ranks 34th and Guatemala ranks 34th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).