Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Equatorial Guinea: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 2 against 2 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 125th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 125th of 167 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1 | 2 | 1 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 1 | 1 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Equatorial Guinea?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 2 against 2 in Equatorial Guinea as of 1991.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Equatorial Guinea?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 1991.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 125th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 125th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).