Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Egypt: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Egypt
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 2 against 2 in Egypt, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Egypt ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 125th and Egypt ranks 125th of 167 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Egypt | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 3 | 5 | 2 | Egypt |
| 1930s | 1.86 | 3 | 1.14 | Egypt |
| 1940s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1.4 | 0.4 | Egypt |
| 1980s | 1 | 2 | 1 | Egypt |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Egypt?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 2 against 2 in Egypt as of 1991.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Egypt?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Egypt?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 1991.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Egypt rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 125th and Egypt ranks 125th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).