Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Comoros: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Comoros
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 2 against 2 in Comoros, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 125th and Comoros ranks 125th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Comoros in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Comoros | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1980s | 1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1990s | 2 | 3 | 1 | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Comoros?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 2 against 2 in Comoros as of 1991.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Comoros?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Comoros?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 1991.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Comoros rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 125th and Comoros ranks 125th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).