Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Cameroon: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Cameroon
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 2 against 2 in Cameroon, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 125th and Cameroon ranks 125th of 167 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Cameroon in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Cameroon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1.2 | 0.2 | Cameroon |
| 1990s | 2 | 3 | 1 | Cameroon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Cameroon?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 2 against 2 in Cameroon as of 1991.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cameroon?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cameroon?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 1991.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cameroon rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 125th and Cameroon ranks 125th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).