Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Cambodia: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
2
in 1991
Cambodia
2
in 2018
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
125th
Cambodia rank
125th
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Cambodia
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 2 against 2 in Cambodia, a difference of 0.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Cambodia has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 125th and Cambodia ranks 125th of 167 countries.
Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Cambodia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 1 | 2 | 1 | Cambodia |
| 1960s | 1 | 2 | 1 | Cambodia |
| 1970s | 1 | 1.5 | 0.5 | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Cambodia?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 2 against 2 in Cambodia as of 1991.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cambodia?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cambodia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1955 to 1978.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cambodia rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 125th and Cambodia ranks 125th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).