Belgium vs Côte d'Ivoire: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Belgium
3
in 2018
Côte d'Ivoire
3
in 2018
Belgium rank
94th
Côte d'Ivoire rank
94th
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Belgium
- Côte d'Ivoire
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 3 against 3 in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 50 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 94th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 94th of 167 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Côte d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4 | 1 | 3 | Belgium |
| 1970s | 5 | 1 | 4 | Belgium |
| 1980s | 5 | 1 | 4 | Belgium |
| 1990s | 5 | 2.1 | 2.9 | Belgium |
| 2000s | 5 | 3 | 2 | Belgium |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Belgium or Côte d'Ivoire?
- Belgium, at 3 against 3 in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Belgium and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 0, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 50 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2018.
- How do Belgium and Côte d'Ivoire rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Belgium ranks 94th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 94th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).