Bangladesh vs Kazakhstan: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Bangladesh
2
in 2018
Kazakhstan
2
in 2018
Bangladesh rank
125th
Kazakhstan rank
125th
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Bangladesh
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 2 against 2 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 125th and Kazakhstan ranks 125th of 167 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1.88 | 1 | 0.875 | Bangladesh |
| 1980s | 1.6 | 1.2 | 0.4 | Bangladesh |
| 1990s | 2.9 | 2.4 | 0.5 | Bangladesh |
| 2000s | 2.9 | 2 | 0.9 | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 3.22 | 2 | 1.22 | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Bangladesh or Kazakhstan?
- Bangladesh, at 2 against 2 in Kazakhstan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Bangladesh and Kazakhstan?
- 0, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Kazakhstan?
- 47 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2018.
- How do Bangladesh and Kazakhstan rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Bangladesh ranks 125th and Kazakhstan ranks 125th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).