Armenia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Armenia
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 4 against 4 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 57 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 34th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 34th of 167 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Trinidad and Tobago in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Armenia |
| 1970s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Armenia |
| 1980s | 1.2 | 3.6 | 2.4 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 1990s | 3.3 | 4 | 0.7 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2000s | 3.3 | 4 | 0.7 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 3.11 | 4 | 0.8889 | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Armenia or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Armenia, at 4 against 4 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Armenia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 57 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2018.
- How do Armenia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Armenia ranks 34th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 34th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).