Trinidad and Tobago vs Zambia: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Trinidad and Tobago
3
in 2018
Zambia
3
in 2018
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st
Zambia rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Trinidad and Tobago
- Zambia
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 3 against 3 in Zambia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Zambia ahead.
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Trinidad and Tobago averaged higher in 4 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Trinidad and Tobago | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2 | 2.67 | 0.6667 | Zambia |
| 1970s | 2 | 1.2 | 0.8 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 1980s | 2.9 | 1 | 1.9 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 1990s | 3 | 2 | 1 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2000s | 3 | 2.1 | 0.9 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Trinidad and Tobago or Zambia?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 3 against 3 in Zambia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Trinidad and Tobago and Zambia?
- 0, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Trinidad and Tobago and Zambia?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2018.
- How do Trinidad and Tobago and Zambia rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).