Sweden vs East Timor: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Sweden
3
in 2018
East Timor
3
in 2018
Sweden rank
1st
East Timor rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Sweden
- East Timor
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 3 against 3 in East Timor, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Sweden ahead.
Sweden ranks 1st and East Timor ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sweden | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 | 2 | 1 | Sweden |
| 2010s | 3 | 2.78 | 0.2222 | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Sweden or East Timor?
- Sweden, at 3 against 3 in East Timor as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Sweden and East Timor?
- 0, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and East Timor?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2018.
- How do Sweden and East Timor rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Sweden ranks 1st and East Timor ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).