Philippines vs Senegal: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Philippines
3
in 2018
Senegal
3
in 2018
Philippines rank
1st
Senegal rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Philippines
  • Senegal
11.522.53193519762018

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 3 against 3 in Senegal, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Senegal ahead.

Philippines ranks 1st and Senegal ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines Senegal Difference Ahead
1960s 3 1.44 1.56 Philippines
1970s 1.4 1.2 0.2 Philippines
1980s 1.67 1.11 0.5556 Philippines
1990s 3 1 2 Philippines
2000s 3 3 0
2010s 3 3 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Philippines or Senegal?
Philippines, at 3 against 3 in Senegal as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Philippines and Senegal?
0, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Senegal?
57 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2018.
How do Philippines and Senegal rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Philippines ranks 1st and Senegal ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).