Philippines vs Poland: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Philippines
3
in 2018
Poland
3
in 2018
Philippines rank
1st
Poland rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Philippines
- Poland
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 3 against 3 in Poland, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1935 it was Philippines ahead.
Philippines ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Philippines |
| 1940s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Philippines |
| 1950s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Philippines |
| 1960s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Philippines |
| 1970s | 1.4 | 1 | 0.4 | Philippines |
| 1980s | 1.67 | 1.11 | 0.5556 | Philippines |
| 1990s | 3 | 2.9 | 0.1 | Philippines |
| 2000s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Philippines or Poland?
- Philippines, at 3 against 3 in Poland as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Philippines and Poland?
- 0, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Poland?
- 75 years are reported by both, from 1935 to 2018.
- How do Philippines and Poland rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Philippines ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).