Peru vs USSR: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Peru
3
in 2018
USSR
2
in 1991
Peru rank
1st
USSR rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Peru
  • USSR
0123182119192018

How they compare

Peru currently reports 3 against 2 in USSR, a difference of 1.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.5 times USSR's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1922 it was USSR ahead.

Peru ranks 1st and USSR ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 5 and USSR in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Peru USSR Difference Ahead
1920s 1 1 0
1930s 3 1 2 Peru
1940s 2.4 1 1.4 Peru
1950s 0.8 1 0.2 USSR
1960s 2 1 1 Peru
1970s 0 1 1 USSR
1980s 3 1 2 Peru
1990s 3 2 1 Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Peru or USSR?
Peru, at 3 against 2 in USSR as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Peru and USSR?
1, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and USSR?
65 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 1991.
How do Peru and USSR rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Peru ranks 1st and USSR ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).