Peru vs Poland: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Peru
3
in 2018
Poland
3
in 2018
Peru rank
1st
Poland rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Peru
  • Poland
0123182119192018

How they compare

Peru currently reports 3 against 3 in Poland, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 86 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Poland ahead.

Peru ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 3 and Poland in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Peru Poland Difference Ahead
1910s 3 3 0 β€”
1920s 1 2.2 1.2 Poland
1930s 3 1 2 Peru
1940s 1 1 0 β€”
1950s 0.8 1 0.2 Poland
1960s 2 1 1 Peru
1970s 0 1 1 Poland
1980s 3 1.1 1.9 Peru
1990s 0.6 2.9 2.3 Poland
2000s 3 3 0 β€”
2010s 3 3 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Peru or Poland?
Peru, at 3 against 3 in Poland as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Peru and Poland?
0, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Poland?
86 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2018.
How do Peru and Poland rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Peru ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).