New Zealand vs Slovakia: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
New Zealand
3
in 2018
Slovakia
3
in 2018
New Zealand rank
1st
Slovakia rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- New Zealand
- Slovakia
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 3 against 3 in Slovakia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 92 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Slovakia ahead.
New Zealand ranks 1st and Slovakia ranks 1st of 167 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | New Zealand |
| 1950s | 3 | 1 | 2 | New Zealand |
| 1960s | 3 | 1 | 2 | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 3 | 1 | 2 | New Zealand |
| 1980s | 3 | 1.1 | 1.9 | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 3 | 2.7 | 0.3 | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, New Zealand or Slovakia?
- New Zealand, at 3 against 3 in Slovakia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between New Zealand and Slovakia?
- 0, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Slovakia?
- 92 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2018.
- How do New Zealand and Slovakia rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- New Zealand ranks 1st and Slovakia ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).