New Zealand vs North Macedonia: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
New Zealand
3
in 2018
North Macedonia
3
in 2018
New Zealand rank
1st
North Macedonia rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- New Zealand
- North Macedonia
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 3 against 3 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 90 shared years of data; in 1921 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 167 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 3 | 1 | 2 | New Zealand |
| 1930s | 3 | 1 | 2 | New Zealand |
| 1940s | 3 | 1 | 2 | New Zealand |
| 1950s | 3 | 1 | 2 | New Zealand |
| 1960s | 3 | 1 | 2 | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 3 | 1 | 2 | New Zealand |
| 1980s | 3 | 1 | 2 | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 3 | 1.9 | 1.1 | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 3 | 2.8 | 0.2 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, New Zealand or North Macedonia?
- New Zealand, at 3 against 3 in North Macedonia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between New Zealand and North Macedonia?
- 0, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and North Macedonia?
- 90 years are reported by both, from 1921 to 2018.
- How do New Zealand and North Macedonia rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- New Zealand ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).