Nepal vs Peru: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Nepal
3
in 2018
Peru
3
in 2018
Nepal rank
1st
Peru rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Nepal
  • Peru
0123180019092018

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 3 against 3 in Peru, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 183 shared years of data; in 1821 it was Nepal ahead.

Nepal ranks 1st and Peru ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Across the 20 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 4 and Peru in 13.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Peru Difference Ahead
1820s 1 1.6 0.6 Peru
1830s 1 1.5 0.5 Peru
1840s 0.6 0 0.6 Nepal
1850s 0 0 0
1860s 0 0 0
1870s 0 0 0
1880s 0 1.5 1.5 Peru
1890s 0 3 3 Peru
1900s 0 3 3 Peru
1910s 0 3 3 Peru
1920s 0 1 1 Peru
1930s 0 3 3 Peru
1940s 0 2.4 2.4 Peru
1950s 1.12 0.5 0.625 Nepal
1960s 1 2 1 Peru
1970s 1 0 1 Nepal
1980s 1.9 3 1.1 Peru
1990s 2 0.6 1.4 Nepal
2000s 1.56 3 1.44 Peru
2010s 2.11 3 0.8889 Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Nepal or Peru?
Nepal, at 3 against 3 in Peru as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Nepal and Peru?
0, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Peru?
183 years are reported by both, from 1821 to 2018.
How do Nepal and Peru rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Nepal ranks 1st and Peru ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).