Morocco vs Oman: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Morocco
1
in 2018
Oman
1
in 2018
Morocco rank
117th
Oman rank
117th

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Morocco
  • Oman
00.20.40.60.81180019092018

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 1 against 1 in Oman, a difference of 0.

Across all 174 years both countries report, Oman has been ahead every year.

Morocco ranks 117th and Oman ranks 117th of 166 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Morocco Oman Difference Ahead
1800s 1 1 0 β€”
1810s 1 1 0 β€”
1820s 1 1 0 β€”
1830s 1 1 0 β€”
1840s 1 1 0 β€”
1850s 1 1 0 β€”
1860s 1 1 0 β€”
1870s 1 1 0 β€”
1880s 1 1 0 β€”
1890s 1 1 0 β€”
1900s 1 1 0 β€”
1910s 1 1 0 β€”
1950s 1 1 0 β€”
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Morocco or Oman?
Morocco, at 1 against 1 in Oman as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Morocco and Oman?
0, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Oman?
174 years are reported by both, from 1800 to 2018.
How do Morocco and Oman rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Morocco ranks 117th and Oman ranks 117th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).