Montenegro vs Panama: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Montenegro
3
in 2018
Panama
3
in 2018
Montenegro rank
1st
Panama rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Montenegro
- Panama
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 3 against 3 in Panama, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 90 shared years of data; in 1921 it was Panama ahead.
Montenegro ranks 1st and Panama ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1.62 | 0.625 | Panama |
| 1960s | 1 | 1.6 | 0.6 | Panama |
| 1970s | 1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | Montenegro |
| 1980s | 1 | 1.2 | 0.2 | Panama |
| 1990s | 1 | 3 | 2 | Panama |
| 2000s | 2.4 | 3 | 0.6 | Panama |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Montenegro or Panama?
- Montenegro, at 3 against 3 in Panama as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Montenegro and Panama?
- 0, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Panama?
- 90 years are reported by both, from 1921 to 2018.
- How do Montenegro and Panama rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Montenegro ranks 1st and Panama ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).