Mongolia vs Taiwan: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Mongolia
3
in 2018
Taiwan
3
in 2018
Mongolia rank
1st
Taiwan rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Mongolia
  • Taiwan
11.522.53192419712018

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 3 against 3 in Taiwan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 70 shared years of data; in 1949 it was Taiwan ahead.

Mongolia ranks 1st and Taiwan ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Taiwan Difference Ahead
1940s 1 1 0 β€”
1950s 1 1 0 β€”
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 2.8 2.2 0.6 Mongolia
2000s 3 3 0 β€”
2010s 3 3 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Mongolia or Taiwan?
Mongolia, at 3 against 3 in Taiwan as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Mongolia and Taiwan?
0, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Taiwan?
70 years are reported by both, from 1949 to 2018.
How do Mongolia and Taiwan rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Mongolia ranks 1st and Taiwan ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).