Mongolia vs Poland: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Mongolia
3
in 2018
Poland
3
in 2018
Mongolia rank
1st
Poland rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Mongolia
  • Poland
11.522.53191819682018

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 3 against 3 in Poland, a difference of 0.

Across all 87 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Mongolia ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Poland Difference Ahead
1920s 1 1.67 0.6667 Poland
1930s 1 1 0 β€”
1940s 1 1 0 β€”
1950s 1 1 0 β€”
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1.1 0.1 Poland
1990s 2.8 2.9 0.1 Poland
2000s 3 3 0 β€”
2010s 3 3 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Mongolia or Poland?
Mongolia, at 3 against 3 in Poland as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Mongolia and Poland?
0, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Poland?
87 years are reported by both, from 1924 to 2018.
How do Mongolia and Poland rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Mongolia ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).