Mongolia vs North Macedonia: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Mongolia
3
in 2018
North Macedonia
3
in 2018
Mongolia rank
1st
North Macedonia rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Mongolia
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 3 against 3 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 87 shared years of data; in 1924 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2.8 | 1.9 | 0.9 | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 3 | 2.8 | 0.2 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Mongolia or North Macedonia?
- Mongolia, at 3 against 3 in North Macedonia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Mongolia and North Macedonia?
- 0, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and North Macedonia?
- 87 years are reported by both, from 1924 to 2018.
- How do Mongolia and North Macedonia rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Mongolia ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).