Moldova vs Sierra Leone: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Moldova
3
in 2018
Sierra Leone
3
in 2018
Moldova rank
1st
Sierra Leone rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Moldova
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 3 against 3 in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Moldova ranks 1st and Sierra Leone ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Moldova averaged higher in 2 and Sierra Leone in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1 | 2.44 | 1.44 | Sierra Leone |
| 1970s | 1 | 1.1 | 0.1 | Sierra Leone |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 0.5714 | 1.43 | Moldova |
| 2000s | 3 | 2.38 | 0.625 | Moldova |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Moldova or Sierra Leone?
- Moldova, at 3 against 3 in Sierra Leone as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Moldova and Sierra Leone?
- 0, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Sierra Leone?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2018.
- How do Moldova and Sierra Leone rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Moldova ranks 1st and Sierra Leone ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).