Moldova vs Peru: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Moldova
3
in 2018
Peru
3
in 2018
Moldova rank
1st
Peru rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Moldova
  • Peru
0123180019092018

How they compare

Moldova currently reports 3 against 3 in Peru, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 166 shared years of data; in 1821 it was Moldova ahead.

Moldova ranks 1st and Peru ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Across the 18 decades both report, Moldova averaged higher in 7 and Peru in 9.

Head to head by decade

Decade Moldova Peru Difference Ahead
1820s 1 1.6 0.6 Peru
1830s 1 1.5 0.5 Peru
1840s 1 0 1 Moldova
1850s 1 0 1 Moldova
1860s 1 0 1 Moldova
1870s 1 0 1 Moldova
1880s 1 1.5 0.5 Peru
1890s 1 3 2 Peru
1900s 1 3 2 Peru
1910s 0.7778 3 2.22 Peru
1940s 1 2.33 1.33 Peru
1950s 1 0.8 0.2 Moldova
1960s 1 2 1 Peru
1970s 1 0 1 Moldova
1980s 1 3 2 Peru
1990s 2 0.6 1.4 Moldova
2000s 3 3 0
2010s 3 3 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Moldova or Peru?
Moldova, at 3 against 3 in Peru as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Moldova and Peru?
0, with Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Peru?
166 years are reported by both, from 1821 to 2018.
How do Moldova and Peru rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Moldova ranks 1st and Peru ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).