Mexico vs Sri Lanka: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Mexico
3
in 2018
Sri Lanka
3
in 2018
Mexico rank
1st
Sri Lanka rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Mexico
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 3 against 3 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 71 shared years of data; in 1948 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Mexico ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 1 | 3 | 2 | Sri Lanka |
| 1950s | 1 | 3 | 2 | Sri Lanka |
| 1960s | 1 | 3 | 2 | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 1 | 3 | 2 | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 1 | 3 | 2 | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 1.6 | 3 | 1.4 | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 3 | 2.44 | 0.5556 | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Mexico or Sri Lanka?
- Mexico, at 3 against 3 in Sri Lanka as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Mexico and Sri Lanka?
- 0, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Sri Lanka?
- 71 years are reported by both, from 1948 to 2018.
- How do Mexico and Sri Lanka rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Mexico ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).