Mexico vs Nepal: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Mexico
3
in 2018
Nepal
3
in 2018
Mexico rank
1st
Nepal rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Mexico
  • Nepal
0123180019092018

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 3 against 3 in Nepal, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 181 shared years of data; in 1822 it was Nepal ahead.

Mexico ranks 1st and Nepal ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Across the 20 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 11 and Nepal in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Nepal Difference Ahead
1820s 0 1 1 Nepal
1830s 0 1 1 Nepal
1840s 0 0.75 0.75 Nepal
1850s 0 0 0
1860s 0.3333 0 0.3333 Mexico
1870s 1 0 1 Mexico
1880s 1 0 1 Mexico
1890s 1 0 1 Mexico
1900s 1 0 1 Mexico
1910s 0.25 0 0.25 Mexico
1920s 0.6 0 0.6 Mexico
1930s 1 0 1 Mexico
1940s 1 0 1 Mexico
1950s 1 1.12 0.125 Nepal
1960s 1 1 0
1970s 1 1 0
1980s 1 1.9 0.9 Nepal
1990s 1.6 2 0.4 Nepal
2000s 3 1.6 1.4 Mexico
2010s 3 2.11 0.8889 Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Mexico or Nepal?
Mexico, at 3 against 3 in Nepal as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Mexico and Nepal?
0, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Nepal?
181 years are reported by both, from 1822 to 2018.
How do Mexico and Nepal rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Mexico ranks 1st and Nepal ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).