Mauritius vs Mongolia: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Mauritius
3
in 2018
Mongolia
3
in 2018
Mauritius rank
1st
Mongolia rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Mauritius
  • Mongolia
11.522.53192419712018

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 3 against 3 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 51 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Mongolia Difference Ahead
1960s 3 1 2 Mauritius
1970s 3 1 2 Mauritius
1980s 3 1 2 Mauritius
1990s 3 2.8 0.2 Mauritius
2000s 3 3 0
2010s 3 3 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Mauritius or Mongolia?
Mauritius, at 3 against 3 in Mongolia as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Mauritius and Mongolia?
0, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Mongolia?
51 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2018.
How do Mauritius and Mongolia rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Mauritius ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).