Mauritania vs Rwanda: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Mauritania
0
in 2018
Rwanda
0
in 2018
Mauritania rank
151st
Rwanda rank
151st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Mauritania
- Rwanda
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 0 against 0 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.
Mauritania ranks 151st and Rwanda ranks 151st of 167 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | Mauritania |
| 1980s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Mauritania |
| 1990s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Mauritania |
| 2000s | 0.8 | 0 | 0.8 | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Mauritania or Rwanda?
- Mauritania, at 0 against 0 in Rwanda as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Mauritania and Rwanda?
- 0, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Rwanda?
- 58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2018.
- How do Mauritania and Rwanda rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Mauritania ranks 151st and Rwanda ranks 151st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).