Malaysia vs Netherlands: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Malaysia
3
in 2018
Netherlands
3
in 2018
Malaysia rank
1st
Netherlands rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Malaysia
- Netherlands
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 3 against 3 in Netherlands, a difference of 0.
Across all 62 years both countries report, Netherlands has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 1st and Netherlands ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 2.33 | 3 | 0.6667 | Netherlands |
| 1960s | 2.9 | 3 | 0.1 | Netherlands |
| 1970s | 2 | 3 | 1 | Netherlands |
| 1980s | 2 | 3 | 1 | Netherlands |
| 1990s | 2 | 3 | 1 | Netherlands |
| 2000s | 2.2 | 3 | 0.8 | Netherlands |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Malaysia or Netherlands?
- Malaysia, at 3 against 3 in Netherlands as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Malaysia and Netherlands?
- 0, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Netherlands?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1957 to 2018.
- How do Malaysia and Netherlands rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Malaysia ranks 1st and Netherlands ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).