Lithuania vs USSR: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Lithuania
3
in 2018
USSR
2
in 1991
Lithuania rank
1st
USSR rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Lithuania
  • USSR
11.522.53191819682018

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 3 against 2 in USSR, a difference of 1.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.5 times USSR's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 68 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 1st and USSR ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania USSR Difference Ahead
1920s 2.33 1 1.33 Lithuania
1930s 1 1 0 β€”
1940s 1 1 0 β€”
1950s 1 1 0 β€”
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 2.5 2 0.5 Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Lithuania or USSR?
Lithuania, at 3 against 2 in USSR as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Lithuania and USSR?
1, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and USSR?
68 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 1991.
How do Lithuania and USSR rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Lithuania ranks 1st and USSR ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).