Lithuania vs Sweden: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Lithuania
3
in 2018
Sweden
3
in 2018
Lithuania rank
1st
Sweden rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Lithuania
  • Sweden
11.522.53180019092018

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 3 against 3 in Sweden, a difference of 0.

Across all 99 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Lithuania ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Sweden Difference Ahead
1910s 3 3 0
1920s 2.5 3 0.5 Sweden
1930s 1 3 2 Sweden
1940s 1 3 2 Sweden
1950s 1 3 2 Sweden
1960s 1 3 2 Sweden
1970s 1 3 2 Sweden
1980s 1 3 2 Sweden
1990s 2.9 3 0.1 Sweden
2000s 3 3 0
2010s 3 3 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Lithuania or Sweden?
Lithuania, at 3 against 3 in Sweden as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Lithuania and Sweden?
0, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sweden?
99 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2018.
How do Lithuania and Sweden rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Lithuania ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).