Lithuania vs Sierra Leone: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Lithuania
3
in 2018
Sierra Leone
3
in 2018
Lithuania rank
1st
Sierra Leone rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Lithuania
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 3 against 3 in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Lithuania ranks 1st and Sierra Leone ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Sierra Leone in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1 | 2.44 | 1.44 | Sierra Leone |
| 1970s | 1 | 1.1 | 0.1 | Sierra Leone |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2.86 | 0.5714 | 2.29 | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 3 | 2.38 | 0.625 | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Lithuania or Sierra Leone?
- Lithuania, at 3 against 3 in Sierra Leone as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Lithuania and Sierra Leone?
- 0, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sierra Leone?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2018.
- How do Lithuania and Sierra Leone rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Lithuania ranks 1st and Sierra Leone ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).