Lithuania vs Senegal: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Lithuania
3
in 2018
Senegal
3
in 2018
Lithuania rank
1st
Senegal rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Lithuania
  • Senegal
11.522.53191819682018

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 3 against 3 in Senegal, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Senegal ahead.

Lithuania ranks 1st and Senegal ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Senegal in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Senegal Difference Ahead
1960s 1 1.44 0.4444 Senegal
1970s 1 1.2 0.2 Senegal
1980s 1 1.1 0.1 Senegal
1990s 2.9 1 1.9 Lithuania
2000s 3 3 0
2010s 3 3 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Lithuania or Senegal?
Lithuania, at 3 against 3 in Senegal as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Lithuania and Senegal?
0, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Senegal?
58 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2018.
How do Lithuania and Senegal rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Lithuania ranks 1st and Senegal ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).