Lithuania vs Panama: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Lithuania
3
in 2018
Panama
3
in 2018
Lithuania rank
1st
Panama rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Lithuania
- Panama
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 3 against 3 in Panama, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 99 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 1st and Panama ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 3 and Panama in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Lithuania |
| 1920s | 2.5 | 1 | 1.5 | Lithuania |
| 1930s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1.5 | 0.5 | Panama |
| 1960s | 1 | 1.6 | 0.6 | Panama |
| 1970s | 1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | Lithuania |
| 1980s | 1 | 1.2 | 0.2 | Panama |
| 1990s | 2.9 | 3 | 0.1 | Panama |
| 2000s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Lithuania or Panama?
- Lithuania, at 3 against 3 in Panama as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Lithuania and Panama?
- 0, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Panama?
- 99 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2018.
- How do Lithuania and Panama rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Lithuania ranks 1st and Panama ranks 1st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).