Lithuania vs Mongolia: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Lithuania
3
in 2018
Mongolia
3
in 2018
Lithuania rank
1st
Mongolia rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Lithuania
  • Mongolia
11.522.53191819682018

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 3 against 3 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 93 shared years of data; in 1924 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Mongolia Difference Ahead
1920s 2 1 1 Lithuania
1930s 1 1 0 β€”
1940s 1 1 0 β€”
1950s 1 1 0 β€”
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 2.9 2.8 0.1 Lithuania
2000s 3 3 0 β€”
2010s 3 3 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Lithuania or Mongolia?
Lithuania, at 3 against 3 in Mongolia as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Lithuania and Mongolia?
0, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Mongolia?
93 years are reported by both, from 1924 to 2018.
How do Lithuania and Mongolia rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Lithuania ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).