Libya vs Thailand: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Libya
0
in 2010
Thailand
0
in 2018
Libya rank
151st
Thailand rank
151st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Libya
- Thailand
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 against 0 in Thailand, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Thailand ahead.
Libya ranks 151st and Thailand ranks 151st of 167 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 2 and Thailand in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 1 | 0.7778 | 0.2222 | Libya |
| 1960s | 0.8889 | 0.3333 | 0.5556 | Libya |
| 1970s | 0 | 1.62 | 1.62 | Thailand |
| 1980s | 0 | 2.2 | 2.2 | Thailand |
| 1990s | 0 | 2.7 | 2.7 | Thailand |
| 2000s | 0 | 2.4 | 2.4 | Thailand |
| 2010s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Libya or Thailand?
- Libya, at 0 against 0 in Thailand as of 2010.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Libya and Thailand?
- 0, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Thailand?
- 57 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2010.
- How do Libya and Thailand rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Libya ranks 151st and Thailand ranks 151st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).