Lesotho vs Netherlands: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Lesotho
3
in 2018
Netherlands
3
in 2018
Lesotho rank
1st
Netherlands rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Lesotho
  • Netherlands
0123181519162018

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 3 against 3 in Netherlands, a difference of 0.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Netherlands has been ahead every year.

Lesotho ranks 1st and Netherlands ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Netherlands Difference Ahead
1960s 2 3 1 Netherlands
1970s 0.7 3 2.3 Netherlands
1980s 1 3 2 Netherlands
1990s 1.4 3 1.6 Netherlands
2000s 2.8 3 0.2 Netherlands
2010s 3 3 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Lesotho or Netherlands?
Lesotho, at 3 against 3 in Netherlands as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Lesotho and Netherlands?
0, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Netherlands?
53 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2018.
How do Lesotho and Netherlands rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Lesotho ranks 1st and Netherlands ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).