Lesotho vs Mongolia: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Lesotho
3
in 2018
Mongolia
3
in 2018
Lesotho rank
1st
Mongolia rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Lesotho
  • Mongolia
0123192419712018

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 3 against 3 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 53 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Lesotho ahead.

Lesotho ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Mongolia Difference Ahead
1960s 2 1 1 Lesotho
1970s 0.7 1 0.3 Mongolia
1980s 1 1 0
1990s 1.4 2.8 1.4 Mongolia
2000s 2.8 3 0.2 Mongolia
2010s 3 3 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Lesotho or Mongolia?
Lesotho, at 3 against 3 in Mongolia as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Lesotho and Mongolia?
0, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Mongolia?
53 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2018.
How do Lesotho and Mongolia rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Lesotho ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).