Lesotho vs Lithuania: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Lesotho
3
in 2018
Lithuania
3
in 2018
Lesotho rank
1st
Lithuania rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Lesotho
  • Lithuania
0123191819682018

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 3 against 3 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 53 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Lesotho ahead.

Lesotho ranks 1st and Lithuania ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Lithuania Difference Ahead
1960s 2 1 1 Lesotho
1970s 0.7 1 0.3 Lithuania
1980s 1 1 0
1990s 1.4 2.9 1.5 Lithuania
2000s 2.8 3 0.2 Lithuania
2010s 3 3 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Lesotho or Lithuania?
Lesotho, at 3 against 3 in Lithuania as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Lesotho and Lithuania?
0, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Lithuania?
53 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2018.
How do Lesotho and Lithuania rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Lesotho ranks 1st and Lithuania ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).